David Wragg
Wragg has annexed the words "dictionary" and "manual" for his titles and therefore must be assessed on this basis. The four handbooks appear to have had coffee table origins and are not nearly as attractive nor as informative as the "LMS 150" series produced by David & Charles. In terms of physical presentation they are not even a pale reflection of the gloriously produced D&C series which incorporated the work of many authors, including such worthies as D.S.M. Barrie. The more KPJ sees of Wragg's growing output; the more he is tempted to consider him as a twenty-first century Stretton: that is an author who should never be cited and whose statements always require verification elsewhere.
A historical dictionary of the railways of the
British Isles. Barnsley: Wharncliffe, 2009. 288pp..
This book suffers from several defects, some of which stem from its
use of the term "dictionary" and which might be overlooked had the term
"handbook" or even "encyclopaedia" been used. One expects a dictionary to
be in alphabetical order with precise, concise definitions, but the entries
are long and many topics are subsumed into broad categories which are not
mutually exclusive. Thus there is no heading for Pullman, nor is there one
for Bournemouth Belle, yet both topics are mentioned in a non-lexical
heading "Naming of trains". Furthermore, there is another entry at "High
speed trains" which includes a mention of Silver Jubilee [train] and
Mallard [locomotive]: neither of which are featured in the main
alphabetical sequence.
The entries contain far too many words, many of which add nothing to the
information: more than, nearby, wide and varied, and so on. Many are excessively
long in relation to their overall importance: half a column on Mansell [as
in wheel] and a full column on the Manx Electric Railway. It may seem to
be a harsh judgement, but wait until the omissions are noted: neither Peppercorn
nor Thompson are included yet the broadly comparable Hawksworth is. Hawkshaw,
Garratt and Beyer were sought in vain.
Accuracy seems to be fairly good, yet there is some evidence of sloppiness.
In the entry for the East Kent Railway it is alleged that it was "almost
immediately closed" under British Railways and there is no mention of the
Kent Coalfield which kept part of it alive for several years.
The layout of the text is not helpful: there are whole pages where it is
not immediately clear what a piece of text relates to (remember the dictionary
claim). There is a bibliography which fails to mention Ottley and includes
four titles by Nock and an equal number by Wragg. There is very little evidence
that the book was "read" prior to publication or was "edited". There are
some illustrations which in the case of the portraits can be justified, but
the captions contain some howlers, the most notable being Sir William Stanier
standing beside his locomotive No. 10000 actually Herbert Nigel Gresley.
Neither engineer had been knighted in 1930. Bulleid "left after nationalisation,
angered by the rebuilding of his locomotives": both statements are true,
but were not connected. Two pictures of double-deck trains are visually
interesting, but they have yet to make a significant contribution to British
transport.
Orher serious errors noted included Selby on the route of the Settle
& Carlsle line.
Nevertheless, there is good entry on
Geddes (and he quotes the
'Geddes Axe'). Martin Barnes reviewd it
for J. Rly Canal Hist. Soc.,
2009, 36, 125 and noted further errors whilst observing that it
is a very good read and failed to recognise that it includes the howlers
in the entry on high speed trains.
Men of steam: railwaymen in their own
words. Barnsley: Wharncliffe, 2011. 206pp.
This is a sort of an anthology based mainly on the house magazines
produced by the post-grouping companies and available within the Search Engine
at the NRM. As will be clear from the comments made elsewhere on this page
the author makes sweeping statements of questionable accuracy and obviously
has an incoherent image of that twenty-five year period when wages were reduced
and the threat of being sacked dominated the very large workforce, running
a railway which by and large failed to respond to road competition. On the
other hand some of the personal accounts are informative and entertaining.
Signal failure: politics & Britain's
railways. Stroud: Sutton, 2004. 202pp.
The Michelin Micheline railcars had pneumatic tyres,
not solid ones as suggested by Wragg on page 90. It is debatable that the
English-Electric diesel-electric railcars were "better" than the Great Western
diesel mechanical cars introduced in the 1930s (same page). On page 88 the
Southern Railway is alleged to have "squandered money" on the Night Ferry
service and that the Atlantic Coast Express was wasteful in terms of rolling
stock utilisation.
On pp. 120-1 there is the most extraordinary statement which refers to the
tank engine based on the Class 5 and the use of Merchant Navy and Britannia
classes into Charing Cross! Firing at this stage of the journey was almost
a criminal offence. Here is the relevant text:
While many of Bulleid's initiatives on the Southern Railway's Pacific locomotives were appreciated, the main focus of attention was on Stanier's mixed-traffic locomotives, and this design was modified slightly, most noticeably by the design of the tender, and returned to production both in tender and tank engine form. The new standard Pacific, the 'Britannia' class, owed much to Stanier, but incorporated some Bulleid features, while the rebuilding of the Bulleid Pacifies led Bulleid to resign. The 'Britannia' class, while more reliable than the Bulleid 'Merchant Navy', 'West Country' and 'Battle of Britain' classes, was markedly less economical. The author recalls a railway manager who had earlier in his career been a fireman telling him that when a train was hauled by a 'Merchant Navy' he could probably relax before it cleared London Bridge, but that he had to continue firing almost all the way to Charing Cross on a 'Britannia'!
Gibbins in Backtrack, 2012, 26, 539 uses this nonsense to criticise British Railways' motive power policy.
Wartime on the railways. Stroud (Gloucs):
Sutton, 2006. 200pp.
Not well organised; mainly WW2. Bibliography fails to note
Pratt's magisterial study of WW1 (AWOL Norwich &
Norfolk) and It can now be revealed..
The handbooks
The handbooks were reviewed as separate volumes by four different
reviewers in J. Rly Canal
Hist. Soc., 2011 (212) 54-5. One of the reviewers (William Featherstone)
was firecely critical: "The book is not redeemed by its illustrations; maps
too few and too small, timetables too many and it has an unexciting selection
of photographs (a third three-quarter locomotive pictures)". The other reviewers
appear to have been bowled over by receiving a free copy and failed to recognise
systemic faults and in particular the complete lack of mention of freight
traffic in the Southern Handbook: the other three give freight due attention,
but not in a systematic manner which a "handbook"
demands. Geoffrey Hughes LNER (1986)
page 149 showed how it should have been done.
Like most railway enthusiasts Wragg is dazzled by the chief mechanical engineers
yet in most cases fails to appreciate the role of the chief civil engineer
(the LNER was atypical in that it lacked one until the appointment of J.C.L.
Train, after Gresley's death: before that civil engineering was an area
responsibility). Perhaps, predictably Wragg mentions John Miller, the civil
engineer for the North Eastern area, but not J.C.L. Train who took over from
him and assumed all-line responability. Similarly, chairmen and board members
are largely ignored: part of the Southern's success may have been due to
its proximity to City finance, rather than to northern industrialists who
were mainly interested in cheap transport for their products and raw
materials. The Railway & Canal Historical Society reviews are repeated
below. To return to civil engineering, it is disingenuous of Wragg to consider
this towards the end of these "handbooks" as it is a key limiting factor
on all railways and dictated motive power policy and the ability to hadle
traffic.
One feels that Wragg lacks the technical skills necessary to produce a series
of what claim to be handbooks. It is evident that he has read far too little
and sought too little assistance from experts in the subject. The publisher
is also blameworthy and debases its reputation as a publisher of "handbooks"
for DIY car mechanics.
The GWR Handbook: The Great Western Railway
1923-1947. David Wragg. Haynes Publishing, 2010, 248pp. Reviewed
by Rodney Hartley. [54]
This book is a re-issue of the book first published in 2006 by Sutton
Publishing. While basically, it may be termed as a 'coffee table' book, it
does form a useful reference to the Great Western Railway, perhaps as a starting
point for further study of the various details of the Company. Many of the
items covered are quite brief, notably the constituent companies and later
acquisitions, although the antecedents and neighbours together with Paddington
Station are covered in some detail. Likewise, the chapter on Great Western
shipping services covers only four pages, that on associated air services
merits only five. There are two chapters covering the Second World War totalling
sixteen pages. The Great Western's foray into bus transport is covered, and
there are chapters on the named expresses and publicity. The various General
Managers receive briefbiographies. There are useful appendices, ranging from
Locomotive Headcodes to locomotives absorbed at the grouping of 1923 and
all GWR locomotives are listed, together with Diesel Railcars and Shunting
engines. There is a relatively short bibliography and an extensive index.
However, the question, which must be asked, is whether this book is worth
the high price?
Southern Railway Handbook: The Southern Railway
1923-1947. David Wragg. Haynes Publishing, 2010, 248pp, Reviewed
by Graham Bird. [54]
Originally reviewed in the July 2004
Journal, this volume has now been re-issued by a different
publisher. It is a well-balanced account of its subject, with 18 chapters
covering topics such as electrification, marketing, accidents, air, shipping
and (rather briefly) road services, ending with nationalisation and 'What
might have been'. There is also useful coverage of the Southern's London
termini, its coastal destinations, and its managers. One perhaps debatable
assertion is that the Romney Hythe & Dymchurch Railway acted as a feeder
to the SR; given the substantial holiday traffic which the latter brought
to this part of Kent, the opposite seems more likely.
Locomotive development occupies nine pages and the various classes are also
listed in two Appendices, but these should be treated with caution. There
are several errors for example, the numbering of the Q, UI and W classes
and omissions, such as the USA 0-6-0Ts; the lists of locomotive names
at first appear complete but do not include all pre-grouping types. The eight
pages of (steam) headcodes might have been more usefully devoted to tabulated
summaries of locomotive dimensions and technical data, and of traffic and
revenue statistics. Overall the book is attractively produced. An index and
bibliography (secondary sources only) are included
KPJ: if freight had not been neglected this would have been moderately
successful. The concept of a sectiuon on London termini was appropraite for
the Southern, but did not carry over well to the northern companies: viewed
from Aberdeen or Inverness Fenchurch Street was irrelevant. The map used
on the front end-papers is clearly not a Sothern map as it gives undue prominence
to the Great Western!.
LNER Handbook: the London & North Eastern
Railway 1923-1947. David Wragg. Haynes Publishing, 2011, 256pp,
Reviewed by Philip Scowcroft. [54-5]
This is basically a readable reference book, one of four, each covering
one of the Big Four, created by the Grouping of 1923. The LNER, the second
largest, was the poorest funded and circumstances did not help as it was
dependent on goods traffic more than the other three and, especially in the
1920s, labour relations and growing road competition conspired against the
LNER particularly. Yet it achieved much. This book is divided into 22 themed
chapters, which inevitably produces some overlapping but does not affect
readability. We start with the LNER constituents, subsidiaries, joint ventures
and immediate neighbours, then London terminals and provincial centres. Chapters
follow on the company's setting-up and its leading managers, mechanical and
administrative (the names Gresley, Wedgwood and Whitelaw show how fortunate
the LNER was in its leading servants). Four chapters are devoted to locomotives;
electrics and diesels having one to themselves. These lead to a longish and
interesting chapter on named trains, almost thirty of them and others on
goods traffic (it should have been longer) and passenger business, with shorter
sub-studies on publicity and record-breaking runs. Shipping was important
as was road transport, the latter more summarily dealt with, as are accidents
three important ones from 1947 (Doncaster, Gidea Park and Goswick)
could have been mentioned. Longer chapters discuss infrastructure (stations,
goods depots, workshops) and, divided into two, wartime experience. The two
final chapters deal with the years 1945-7 and the onset of nationalisation
and pose the question whether the latter could or should have been avoided
(on the whole the answer is in the negative). Five appendices variously list
LNER locomotives, a bibliography is short yet surprisingly detailed, and
there is an index. A very recommendable book, both for the student and general
reader, and comprehensive, though maybe there should have been a chapter
employees' welfare, cultural and sporting activities, perhaps covering the
company's own labour relations. The photographs, variable in quality
we must remember they are up to 60 years old illustrate the text
appropriately.
KPJ: on page 100 there is an illustartion of No. 2001 Cock
o' the North in its original state which the caption clearly identifies,
but then states "was later rebuilt as a semi-streamlined Pacific".
The mishapen Thompson rebuild was remote from the original semi-streamlined
locomotive. George Dow is not mentioned in the text on public relations nor
acknowledged for his Dowagram shown on page 30. The concept of joint railways
seems to befuddle Wragg: the Cheshire Lines Committee was in many ways an
integral part of the LNER giving it access not only to Liverpool, but to
wholly owned lines in Wales. Similary, the line to Aylesbury from Amersham
remained in the shared ownership of the LNER and LPTB, albeit the latter
ceased to provide motive power for its services north of Amersham after 1937.
The deal between the Midland and the Tilbury line was done before the LNER
was envisaged and could not be undone
LMS Handbook: The London Midland & Scottish
Railway 1923-1947. David Wragg. Haynes Publishing, 2010, 256pp.
Reviewed by William Featherstone. [55]
The dictionary [used by reviewer] defines a handbook as a 'manual,
a handy compendium of a large subject', and such a volume on the largest
of the 1923 Grouping companies would fill a gap on the bookshelf and be very
welcome. At first sight this large handsome volume, with a series of thematic
chapters including ancestor companies, managers, locomotives, freight,
passenger services, named expresses, publicity, records, Ireland, ships and
ports, road services, air services, accidents, WWII and nationalisation
together with five appendices and a very short if dated bibliography, might
meet both need and definition. It fails at the most basic level; a reference
work needs to be accessible, and an index that in most cases refers the reader
the wrong page and has entries relating to non-existent text (the de Havilland
Dove aircraft for instance but then the LMS did not use this plane anyway)
is fundamentally flawed. There are many other problems and is poorly proof
read; for example, Leeds finds itself 99.1 miles from London, Wolverhampton
the site of the company's carriage works, and the LMS handing seven billion
tons of freight in a year. It is inaccurate with the chapter on air services
missing the significant factors such as mail and parcels services and more
aircraft errors. The Micheline, no doubt because it had rubber tyres, becomes
a road/rail vehicle, and major accidents are the fault of infrastructure
even though the preceding chapter makes clear most were human error. It is
unbalanced four pages on Euston, one paragraph on Broad Street; the
war ends in 1942 for the LMS. It is also repetitious, with frequent accusations
that the company was too large, should not have taken over the LT &SR,
and did not electrify enough (and so was nationalised!).
The book is not redeemed by its illustrations; maps too few and too small,
timetables too many and it has an unexciting selection of photographs (a
third three- quarter locomotive pictures). Given major revision and correction
this could be a handsome and useful work but as it stands it cannot be
recommended.
KPJ: Considering the Author's stated Ulster links it is remarkable that there is no mention of William Kelly Wallace, who implemented many of the improvements on the Northern Counties system and then moved on to become Chief Civil Engineer of the LMS in 1934. Prior to that another Irishman E.C. Trench had bedevilled early locomotive development on the LMS through his strictures. Looking at the series as a whole Wragg, like many railway enthusiats, fails to realise that the engineers on any railway were the chief civil engineers. There is a similar neglect to record the chairmen of the Board who played a major role in capital projects. City financial involvement clearly aided the Southern electrification. There is too much repetition and clear evidence that the texts were not read by a publisher's reader. There is some evidence to indicate that the Author is unaware of the status of the post-grouping railways: to a great extent they were hemmed in by the legislation which had established them which in retrospect was badly designed: a more flexible structure might have avoided some of the initial managerial problems.
2015-06-10