Hughes locomotives (L&YR/LMS)
Steamindex home page
See also Hughes | 4-6-0 | 2-6-0 | 4-6-4T | 0-8-2T |
Aspinall locomotives | railmotors | |||
Antedeluvian LYR locomotives |
It is a very great pity that a Hughes railmotor is not chuffing up the Keighley & Worth Valley and that a four-cylinder 4-6-0 does not await on the mainline to whisk tourists across to Carlisle. A very late dose of chickenpox deprived KPJ from travelling behind the last one to York in 1951 with his pal Philip Normanton. Hughes's wisdom extended to retirement in Cromer. Marshall implies that he was pushed out by Fowler. The truth would seem to be that the LMS should never have been created: the Midland should have amalgamated with the Glasgow & South Western. The newly enlarged LNWR should have operated with its Caledonian subsidiary: Hughes could have worked with Beames.
General works
Cox, E.S. Chronicles of
steam. 1967.
Cox, E.S. Locomotive panorama.
Vol. 1.
Marshall, J.: George Hughes of Horwich.
British Railway Journal, 59, 47.
Marshall, John. The Lancashire & Yorkshire
Railway. Volume 3.
Mason, E. The Lancashire & Yorkshire
Railway in the twentieth century. 1954.
[Mason, E.]"Rivington", pseud. My
life with locomotives: a retired locomotive engineer looks back.
1962.
The pseudonym was unveiled by E.S. Cox on p. 3 of his "Locomotive
panorama" (v.1 .).
Rowledge, J.W.P.
Engines of the L.M.S. built 1923-1951. Oxford: OPC, 1975.
108pp + plates (86 illus.)
A pocketbook: includes drawings (side elevations) of all types
built/supplied to the LMS including the Sentinel railcars. Notes on the Company's
far from standard boilers. Tenders, 8F locomotives supplied during WW2.
Photographic illustrations of most types.
Rowledge, J.W.P. L.M.S.
engines: names, numbers, types and classes. Newton Abbot: David &
Charles, 1989. 160pp.
Text is typescript, but includes outline diagrams of the LMS-designed
locomotives. There is a separate section of plates.
Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway
28 were acquired in 1919 but according to Marshall (p. 192) "the LYR men did not take kindly to them". Fifteen went to the more gentlemanly LNER, three to China and one to Australia. Others fed the furnaces at Crewe.
0-8-0
Four-cylinder compounds
In 1906 rebuilt one of the Aspinall/Hughes 0-8-0s (No. 1452) with
4ft 6in coupled wheels, 15½ by 26in high pressure and 22 x 26in
low pressure cylinders, a total heating surface of 1914ft2 and
a grate area of 23ft2. Eight-wheel tenders were fitted .Tests
showed a 25% saving in coal compared with the non-compound version. Ten compound
and ten non-compound locomotives were built betwen 1906/7. Marshall 3 pp.
172-3. Van Riemsdijk (pp. 76-7) considered
them to be "very successful" and damned the LMS for replacing them with yet
more 4Fs: this work includes a sectionalized elevation and plan and two
informative illustrations.
The 1000th locomotive built at Horwich, Lancashire & Yorkshire Ry.
Locomotive Mag., 1907,
13, 139. illus.
No. 1471
Larger unsuperheated boilers
These used the same boiler as the 0-8-2T. Twenty were built as Lot
66 of 1909/10, and a further twenty were constructed as Lot 74 in 1917. Eighteen
of the original 0-8-0s and fourteen of the corrugated firebox locomotives
were rebuilt with this larger boiler, between 1911 and 1913. Marshall 3 p.
182.
Lancashire & Yorkshire Ry.
Locomotive Mag., 1911,
17, 147. illustration, diagram (side elevation)
Photograph (No. 67) and dimensioned diagram of a "new class" of 0-8-0
mineral engines built at Horwich. Hughes adapted the type of boiler built
for his large 4-6-0 four-cylinder express engines to the mineral locomotive
(frames, wheels, etc.), designed by J.A.F. Aspinall some years ago. The leading
dimensions are given on the diagram, from which can be seen that this engine
has 417 ft more heating surface and 13 tons more adhesion weight than the
original design.
Horwich-built eight-coupled mineral engine, London, Midland and Scottish
Railway. Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev.,
1923, 29, 288. illustration
Hughes superheated coal engine with side-window cab: nNo. 1427 illustrated
with "LM&SR" on bogie tender (works photograph)
Le Fleming, Hugh M.
International locomotives. Plate 63
Text compares appearance to a circus elephant, but also deprecates
early demise by LMS
4-6-0
L&YR Class 8: LMS 5P: Hughes
(Dreadnoughts):
This class originated in 1908 as a four-cylinder, Joy valve gear,
saturated design. According to Marshall (3 pp180-2) the original locomotives
were sluggish and both poor runners and poor steamers. They were fitted with
Joy valve gear, and originally had lagged smokeboxes and bogie brakes (these
were removed by 1914). In 1919/1920 fifteen of these locomotives were rebuilt
with Walschaerts valve gear, long travel valves and 28-element superheaters.
The boilers were rebuilt within the existing shell. They now had a grate
area of 27ft2. Hughes described the design in
Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1909,
77, 561-653 Locomotives designed and built at Horwich with some
results..
Cox (Locomotive panorama 1 p. 11 noted that with very little teething trouble the class achieved a "standard of achievement far higher than anything seen on the parent line up to that time." In line with the rebuilds, a new series was built in batches between 1920 and 1923. The 1923 batch was mentioned in contemporary literature, but a modified series introduced in 1924 does not. This latter series originated as parts for the 4-6-4T design of which only ten out of the order for thirty were built. The 4-6-4Ts received detailed attention. Chapter 5 of E. Mason's The Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway in the twentieth century should also be noted as it is entitled "Hughes' four-cylinder 4-6-0s". According to Nock (Great locomotives of the LMS) comparative tests of the rebuilt locomotives with the 4P compunds showed the 4-6-0s to have a very high fuel consumption. According to Marshall (pp, 193-4) the modernized series suffered from leakage in the piston valves, problems in the back pressure relief valves, air being drawn into the smokebox and axlebox lubrication. The five unmodified locomotives were withdrawn in the 1920s, but most of the others went in the 1930s, although No. 10455 lasted until October 1951 Atkins considers that in their final state they were "near miss"...
[Tests of rebuilt locomotives]. Engineer, 1921, 15 April.
1923 batch
NEW 4-6-0 express locomotive, London, Midland and Scottish Railway. Rly
Mag., 1923, 53, 100. illus.
NEW Horwich-built express locomotive, L.M.S.R..
Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1923,
29, 226-8. illus., 2 diagrs. (s. & f. els.)
1925 experimental equipment of a locomotive with a Vickers feed-water
heater and pump.
FEED water heating on the L.M.S.R.. Rly Mag., 1925, 56,
406-7.
Compounding experiment: 1926
4-6-0 four-cylinder compound locomotive, L.M.S.R..
Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1933,
39, 257. illus.
This rebuilding was undertaken in 1926 by Fowler in connection with
the development of a compound Pacific design.
Atkins, P. West coast
4-6-0s at work. 1981. Chap. 9. The Hughes 'Dreadnoughts'.
Atkins describes tests conducted in 1930 between 10456 against simple
locomotive 10464 between Preston and Carlisle. Fuel savings were modest:
9.8% on a lb/mile basis and 8% in dbhp/hr. But like most LMS tests: the playing
field was unbalanved as the compound had run 43,000 miles, ass against the
less than 4000 of the simple
Cox, E.S. A modern locomotive
history: ten years' development on the L.M.S. 1923-1932. J. Instn
Loco. Engrs., 1946, 36, 100-41. Disc.: 141-70; 275-6.
(Paper No. 457)
Fig. 11 shows the starting valve fitted to No. 10456, a Hughes 4-cylinder
4-6-0, rebuilt as a compound in association with the Pacific project which
was "the most modern but least known compound engine to run in this country"
(he appeared to forget that the Gresley high-pressure locomotive was a
compound)
van Riemsdijk, J.T. Compound locomotives: an International
survey. 1994.
A Kylala blast-pipe was fitted experimentally to No. 10458. Un-titled
notes: Rly Mag.. 1932, 71, 468.
Retrospective and critical
Atkins, P. West coast
4-6-0s at work. 1981. Chap. 9. The Hughes 'Dreadnoughts'.
It is probable that Atkins attributed Hughes paper on the class to
the incorrect engineering institution: Atkins states Civils (correct source
cited above). Includes weight diagram for original series and a detailed
diagram of the front end for the later engines. Notes that Mason did not
mention the LYR dynamometer car completed in 1912 which had been based upon
a Belgian design, nor the tests conducted with it in 1913 between Horwich
and Hellifield using No. 1506; nor of tests conducted in 1918 between Manchester
and Blackpool. At the end of WW1 the still saturated locomotives were consuming
100 lb/mile of coal on the Southport to York run. Many of the existing
locomotives were rebuilt with Walschaerts long travel valve gear and tests
were conducted up to Hellifield on 12 November 1920 (reported Engineer 15
April 1921). The Manchester to Blackpool trials on a Club train are also
noted. Inevitably the 4-cylinder Baltic tank engines are also described and
the series of 4-6-0s which had been intended to be tank engines: these had
larger grates (29.6 ft2) and were sent to Carlisle
Upperby where they sometimes worked to Glasgow. The work barely measured
up to Claughton performance; the lubricating system was inmadequate for long
runs, and there was a very high incidence of hot boxes. Atkins noted that
the built up smokeboxes led to air ingress and to char reaching the cylinders,
and that the piston valves caused problems. In 1925 the class participated
in tests against the Prince of Wales, Claughton and compound classes (KPJ
considers that these tests were statistically invalid). Dabeg feedwater heaters
were fitted to some locomotives used on the Blackpool Club trains which showed
a coal saving of 11% in terms of lb/dbhp and 19.5% in lb/mile.In the last
part of the text in this Chapter a proposed 200 psi boiler is descibed, but
work did not extend to construction.
Coates, Noel and Des
Melia. Des's engines. LMS Journal, (13), 69-80.
Des Melia worked at Burnley Rose Grove from March 1941 and after the
usual tasks of knocking up. acting as guard for the stores van progressed
to be a fiemen. the 4-6-0s were difficult to fire, although were powerful
and fast.
Cook, A.F. Raising steam
on the LMS: the evolution of LMS locomotive boilers. 1999.
"20 4-6-0s which proved to be the most unsuccessful British locomotives
of their era, with numerous mechanical problems, and indifferent performance
for high coal consumption, and uncertainties of steaming."
Cox, E.S. A modern locomotive
history: ten years' development on the L.M.S. 1923-1932. J. Instn
Loco. Engrs., 1946, 36, 100-41. Disc.: 141-70; 275-6.
(Paper No. 457)
Fig. 12 (graph) shows coal consumption within period 1927-1938: a
more or less constant 60lbs/mile.
Geer, H.E. Modern locomotive superheating. Part
1. J. Instn Loco. Engrs., 1926,
16, 419-450. (Paper No. 196)
In Great Britain in 1925 only 7000 superheated locomotives, out of
a total stock of 24,500. This part is concerned about demands placed upon
piston valves and diagrams show Hughes' ball relief valves (Fig. 5); G.F.
Horne (446-7) spoke about the Hughes 4-6-0 and superheated 0-6-0 designs;
leakage from superheater tubes and that Hughes type piston valves were fairly
satisfactory, but after 20,000 miles it was necssary to remove
carbon.
Hawley, R.A. The "Dreadnoughts" and Baltics of the Lancashire &
Yorkshire Rly.. Trains ill., 1952, 5, 440-4.5 illus., table.
The last "Hughes" 4-6-0 withdrawn. J. Stephenson Loco. Soc.,
1952, 28, 265-71. illus., table.
Additional information :1952, 28, 347 :1953, 29, 25;
118-19; 146; 209-10. The letter on p.146 was from E. Mason.
Mason, E. The Lancashire &
Yorkshire Railway in the twentieth century. London, Ian Allan, 1954.
[viii] ,236 p. incl. 32 plates + col. front. + fold;ng plate. 103 illus.,14
diagrs., 2 plans, 10 maps.
Chapter 5 describes the class.
Mason, E. [Rivington], pseud. My
life with locomotives: a retired locomotive engineer looks back. London,
Ian Allan,1962. 168 p. + 22 plates (incl. 2 folding). 53 illus., 4 diagrs.
Problems associated with class. The pseudonym was unveiled by E.S.
Cox on p. 3 of his Locomotive panorama (v.1.).
Tuplin, W.A. The four-cylinder 4-6-0s of the Lancashire & Yorkshire
Railway. Rly Mag., 1952, 98, 372-7. 4 illus., 2 tables.
Detailed and critical study.
2-6-0
5: 1926: Hughes +
Fowler:
Cox (Locomotive panorama, v. 1, p.37) has
shown that this Hughes design owed much to the study of North American practice.
This especially applied to the arrangement of the Walschaerts gear. The use
of a low boiler pressure (180 lb/in2) necessitated large diameter
cylinders (21 in), which had to be steeply inclined for the class to achieve
high route availability. This cylinder arrangement earned, for the class,
the soubriquet of Crabs. The design was slightly modified, before
construction commenced, by Fowler. Marshall deals briefly with the design
in V. 3 pp. 197-201. The LMS Locomotive Profile
No. 2 is highly important.
NEW mixed-traffic locomotives for the London, Midland & Scottish Railway.
Rly Engr, 1926, 47, 320-1 + folding plate. illus., 2 diagrs.
(incl. s. el.), plan.
Includes detailed sectionalized diagrams.
NEW mogul type locomotive, London, Midland & Scottish Ry..
Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1926,
32, 239. illus.
No. 13000 illustrated. Design credited to Fowler: H.G. Burgess, General
Manager, received initial acknowledgement for locomotive built at Horwich
Works.
NEW 2-6-0 locomotive, London, Midland and Scottish Ry.. Loco. Rly Carr.
Wagon Rev., 1926, 32, 2. diagr. (s. el.)
NEW 2-6-0 type mixed-traffic locomotives L.M.S.R.. Rly Mag., 1926,
59, 185 + plate f.p. 169. illus.
1931 Lemon ?:
Five locomotives were modified with Lentz R.C. poppef valves. They
ran in this form until 1953, when Reidinger R.R.valve gear was used as
replacement for the earlier rotary gear (see
British Railways Regional Designs).
2-6-0 mixed traffic engine, L.M. & S. Ry., with rotary cam poppet valve
gear. Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1932, 38, 153-4. illus.,
diagr.
2-6-0 type mixed traffic locomotives, London, Midland & Scottish Railway.
Rly Engr, 1932, 53, 180-3. 2 illus., 4 diagrs, 2 plans.
Retrospective and critical
Cook, A.F. Raising steam
on the LMS: the evolution of LMS locomotive boilers. 1999.
Part of the complex RCTS History of LMS locomotives: the G9HS boiler
is described on page 55.
Cox, E.S. Locomotive panorama,
v. 1, 1965. p.37)
"The cylinders and valve gear were entirely new. Their design followed
a most intensive study of recent American practice as described in certain
currently available publications. Piston valves of 11in
diameter were selected of hollow trunk type, without pressure release
valves, and the thick stiff piston rings of previous Horwich practice were
replaced by much more flexible rings of smaller cross section. 1½in
steam lap was selected in conjunction with a 6 3/8in valve travel. The Walschaert
gear was extremely robust and was largely based upon Pennsylvania Railroad
layout and details. The whole of the foregoing, owing nothing to former L.
& Y. practice, gave effective, accurate, and readily maintainable steam
distribution. For the first time on the L.M.S. a modern standard of performance
and efficiency was maintained. This achievement was greatly strengthened
by the substantial coupled axleboxes which were also provided.
Yoder Locomotive valves
and valve gears and McShane Modern
locomotive valves and valve gears.
Essery, Terry. Steam locomotives
compared. Penryn: Atlantic, 1996. 160pp.
Generally well received by footplate crews, except in terms of disposal
at mpds.
A Horwich success story.
Backtrack, 2015, 29, 374-7.
An excellent selection of black and white photographs which shows
the class at work on express passenger trains (including one in crimson
lake livery); on excursion trains; as fitted with both Lentz and Reidinger
forms of rotary cam poppet valve gear and in a wide variety of locations
including the Highland main line and Edinburgh Waaverley.
James, Fred, Hunt,
David and Essery, Bob. Horwich moguls. LMS Locomotive Profiles
No. 2 2000 72 pp. including folding diagram
Very extensive detailed general arrangement drawings from NRM collections:
currently the premier source of information about this class.
Further information LMS Journal (9),
35-40..
Langridge, E.A. Under
10 CMEs. Usk: Oakwood, 2011. pp. 90-1
before the departure of the L&Y chief, the 2-6-0 Crab was designed,
very much obeying the rules of the various loading gauges - hence its
steeply-inclined cylinders. The size of the cylinders and the pressure of
180 Ib seemed to me to hark back to R.W. Urie, as did the large axle boxes.
They had a valve gear very much influenced by American practice - a long
expansion Iink wIth small swmg and bull rings in the piston valves. I suspect
that there is strong circumstantial evidence that the 8 ft 0 in. + 8 ft 6
in. wheel spacing was copied from the old MR practice. Billington was, I
imagine, a level-headed L&YR man whose remit was to design an all-route
locomotive. You can say 'Let's take a chance and forget the Civil Engineer's
loading gauge rules re clearance on curves and design wide up to the hilt'
- as Coleman later did with Stanier's 2-6-0s, and as a consequence of which
they had to be tried with fingers on all routes.
Marshall, John. The LMS 'Crabs'.
Br. Rly J., 1986, 2,
173
The loss of J.R. Billington
was contributory to the premature retirement of George Hughes; the
correspondence between E.M. Gass,
Hughes and Fowler concerning the design of the Horwich 2-6-0s, and the malign
influence of E.R.C.
Trench.
The 2-6-0 type locomotive. Rly Engr, 1926, 47, 334-5.
Editorial comment on the design.
Poultney, E.C. Locomotive performance and its influence upon
modern practice. J. Instn. Loco. Engrs,
1927, 17, 172-261. Disc.: 261-72. (Paper No. 213)
General assessment of class alongside other British and other contemporary
locomotives
Powell, A.J. Living with London Midland
locomotives. 1977.
Chapter 7: Pony trucks to the fore: criticism of the injectors and
of the sudden substantial fall in water level when the regulator was closed
leading to failure of lead plugs on steeply graded routes.. Nevertheless,
simple rugged machines.
Reeves, John. LMS locomotive operating
costs 1933-1935. Part 1 Freight tender engines. LMS Journal
(7) 7-21.
Statistics gleaned from an official LMS typescript document covering
the period 1933-1935 for repair costs (light, heavy and boiler costs) (total
2.88 3.41 p/engine mile), mileage (38022 34654), coal consumption
(60.71 56.55 lb per engine mile), availability 247 233 days
per annum). Figures are also given for the Lentz valve gear locomotives (in
italics). The absurd precsion of the numbers should be noted.
Stokes, Ken. Both sides of the footplate.
Truro: Bradford Barton. page 39
Originally fitted with an L&YR sliding regulator which was
very difficult to work: eventually replaced with another type
Toms, G. and Essery, R.J. The 'Crab' 2-6-0s of the LMS.
Br. Rly J.,
1986, 2, 2-8.
See also highly significant
letter from John Marshall on Br. Rly J., 1986 (13)page 173 wherein the
loss of J.R. Billington was contributory to the premature retirement of George
Hughes; the correspondence between E.M. Gass, Hughes and Fowler concerning
the design of the Horwich 2-6-0s, and the malign influence of E.R.C.
Trench.
Woollatt, J.S. A criticism of
some aspects of locomotive design. J. Instn Loco. Engrs., 1949,
39, 557-71. (Paper No. 489)
Side control on pony trucks conformed to criteria established by
Carter
Young, John and
Tyreman, David. The Hughes and Stanier 2-6-0s: locomotives of the LMS
series. 208pp.
Colour reproduction poor, especially so in case of No. 13000 (ex
Locomotive Publishing Co.). Black & white photographs: many interesting
especially those showing at work on Highland line.
0-6-0
Hughes 191
with superheaters,enlarged cylinders (20 inch diameter) and piston
valves and mechanical lubricators
Goods locomotive with superheater L&YR.
Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev.,
1910, 16, 93.
Side elevation: illus. of No. 85.
Geer, H.E. Modern locomotive superheating. Part
1. J. Instn Loco. Engrs., 1926,
16, 419-450. (Paper No. 196)
In Great Britain in 1925 only 7000 superheated locomotives, out of
a total stock of 24,500. This part is concerned about demands placed upon
piston valves and diagrams show Hughes' ball relief valves (Fig. 5); G.F.
Horne (446-7) spoke about the Hughes 4-6-0 and superheated 0-6-0 designs;
leakage from superheater tubes and that Hughes type piston valves were fairly
satisfactory, but after 20,000 miles it was necssary to remove carbon.
4-4-0
Aspinall 7ft 3in 4-4-0s rebuilds: 1909
Nos. 1098, 1104, 1105 and 1110 were rebuilt with superheated round-top
boilers, 20 x 26in cylinders, piston valves and long-travel Walschaerts valve
gear, and forced lubrication. This led to a 21% fuel saving, but from 1912
the locomotives were reconstructed with Joy valve gear. Marshall 3
pp139-40.
Banking engines: 1908
These five locomotives were constructed for banking at Accrington
and at Fazakerley. They were very large locomotives with 21½in diameter
cylinders and 180psi boiler pressure. The wheels on the driving and third
axles were flangeless. They carried 3 tons of coal and 2000 gallons of water.
Marshall (3) pp. 178/80. Mason (pp. 181 and 189) noted that they were called
"Little Egberts" and were "uniformly successful
at work. Nevertheless, they did not outlast 1929.
The 0-8-2 tank engine. Loco. Mag.,
1941, 47, 131.
Originally mentioned in
Loco. Mag., 1909, 15,
85
5P: 1924: Hughes
This class was the final British express tank engine design. In all
the LMS inherited three classes of this type and Hughes added the fourth.
The design was based on the rebuilt L&YR 4-6-0s and incorporated four
cylinders. It was a most impressive looking locomotive, but performance,
especially fuel consumption, was poor. Marshall deals briefly with them in
V3. pp. 194-7..
L.M. & S.Ry. Loco.
Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1923, 29, 135.
Forty Baltic "in hand" at Crewe and twenty at Horwich.
"BALTIC" type tank locomotive, LM.&S.R.
Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev., 1924,
30. 105-6. 2 diagrs. (s. & f. els), plan.
"BALTIC" type tank locomotive, L.M.&S.
Ry.. Loco. Rly Carr. Wagon Rev.,
1924, 30, 142-4 + folding plate. diagr. (s. el.), plan.
Sectionalized diagrams included.
FOUR-CYLINDER "Baltic" tank engine, London, Midland & Scottish Railway.
Rly Engr, 1924, 45, 281-2. 2 illus., diagr. (s.el.)
FOUR-CYLINDER 4-6-4 express tank locomotive, L.M.S.R.. Rly Mag., 1924,
54, 396-8. illus.
L.M.S. Railway-Baltic tank locomotive. Engineer, 1924, 138,
582-3. illus., 3 diagrs., 2 plans.
Sectionalized diagrams included.
LM.S. Railway 4-6-4 "Baltic" tank engines. Engineer, 1924, 137,
454. diagr. (s. & r. els.), plan.
Marshall notes that an editorial in The Engineer of 1924 (May)
p. 602 was critical of the type.
NEW four-cylinder "Baltic" 4-6-4 type tank engine; London, Midland &
Scottish Railway. Rly Engr. 1924, 45, 166-7; 207-9 + folding
plate. 3 illus., 4 diagrs. (including side elevation), plan.
Includes a sectionalized diagram.
Last withdrawn
LMSR. Locomotive Mag.,
1942, 48, 50
Notes that with withdrawal of No. 11110 the first locomotive type
designed specifically for the LMS had become extinct
Retrospective and critical
Atkins, P. West coast
4-6-0s at work. 1981. Chap. 9. The Hughes 'Dreadnoughts'.
Mentions tests conducted in 1930 in the Manchester area between this
type and a Fowler 2-6-4T: the latter consumed 19% less fuel.
Hawley, R.A The "Dreadnoughts" and Baltics of the Lancashire
& Yorkshire Rly.. Trains ill., 1952, 5, 440-4. 5 illus.,
table.
A detailed history
Middlemass, Tom. The 'Baltic'
tanks. Backtrack, 1991, 5, 281-7..
Whitelegg, RM. Glasgow and South Western Railway notes. J. Stephenson
Loco. Soc., 1951, 27, 267-71; 257-8; 283. 5 illus.
Whitelegg justified his use of the 4-6-4T on the L.T. & S.R .
and asserted that the Hughes design was based upon his G.& S.W.R.
design.
Livery
Atkins, P. West coast
4-6-0s at work. 1981. Chap. 9. The Hughes 'Dreadnoughts'.
Although Atkins is somewhat unclear as to which livery was applied
to the class, it is clear that No. 11112 was painted in crimson lake
for the Stockton & Darlington Railway Centenary celebration.
Marshall (3 170-1) notes that contact between Hughes and Hurry Riches of the TVR led to the purchase of two Kerr Stuart/Bristol Carriage & Wagon railmotors in 1905. Theses were used on the Bury to Holcombe Brook branch and on Burnley to Colne services. They were withdrawn in 1909. Neverthess, Hughes designed his own type which was introduced in 1906 and eighteen of these were built up to 1911. One just lasted long enough to become part of the British Railways fleet. This success stemmed from the locomotive portion which was essentially just that: a small conventional tank engine with outside cylinders and Walschaerts valve gear. The coach portion was relatively simple to remove. The total heating surface was 509ft2.
Jenkinson, David and Barry C. Lane. British railcars: 1900 to 1950.
1996.
Includes a drawing by Lane on page 24 of the railcars and the special
gangwayed trailers designed to be operated with them. This is probably the
best account of this excellent type.
Hughes became interested in the Belgian Flamme four-cylinder 2-10-0s and a design for similar giant was sketched out in 1913/14. Marshall (3) pp. 188-91. Robin Barnes (Locomotives that never were pp. 24-5) breathes life into this design as LMS No. 12650 crosses Lydgate Viaduct near Todmorden virtually dirtying the clean wahing.
2018-10-06